|
The author of this articles is Stephen Seiler. His
alma mater (B.S. and M.S.) is the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville.
He have earned a PhD in exercise physiology from The University of texas
at Austin. He have published research in The American Journal of
Physiology, the Journal of Applied Pysiology, Free Radical Research,
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Aging: Clinical and
Experimental Research, and The Journal of Strength and Conditioning
Research. He have also given presentations at national meetings of the
American Heart Association, The American College of Sports Medicine, the
Federation of Associations for Experimental Biology, and United States
Rowing. He is now an associate professor at the Institute of Health and
Sport, Agder College, Kristiansand, Norway, and also employed as a
consultant/researcher for a private research foundation. At the college,
he focus a lot of my efforts on teaching and research in the area of
endurance performance. At Agder Research Foundation his primary work is
population health/living standards research and studies adressing the role
of increasing population physical activity as a public health
measure. |
Borrowing from theoretical physics lingo, I am going to try to present a
"Unified Field Theory" if you will of Cross Country ski training, from the
standpoint of endurance capacity development. Unified because it
represents a conceptual blend of my own experience, understanding of the
physiology, translations from the Norwegian training literature, and numerous
conversations with a national class coach here whose insights I value and trust.
Field fits too, because I am going to try to talk in terms that make
sense out in the field, not just in a lab. Unfortunately, a lot of sport
scientists can't think beyond the lab and the "8 week study." Theory is
also appropriate, because no scientist worth his bodyweight in salt would
propose to have the all complexities of physiology and training adaptations
nailed down.
I should also point out that this framework does not assume limitations on
training time, it is based on the long term development of elite athletes. This
is an important point. Much of the research based on untrained or moderately
trained individuals doesn't apply to the elite. However, although this material
is built up from elite training experience, the basic principles have relevance
to us all.
The Big Picture
Below is a training intensity chart, similar perhaps to many you have seen
before. It is a closely patterned after the basic intensity classifications for
endurance training used by XC skiers and trainers in Norway. When they denote
training intensity, this is the language used. I have added another column,
lactate concentration. These values are based on several sources including long
term studies of elite rowers in Germany. I think rowing and XC are very similar
because they are both quadripedal exercise modes.
| Intensity Scale |
Intensity as a % of HR max * |
Lactate Concentration |
Training form |
Comments |
| 1.0 |
60-70% |
1-2.5 mM |
long distance, variable forms |
very important- comprises highest volume of total
training load |
| 2 |
70-80% |
|
distance work, uneven conditions |
used only as variation. This method gives us the least
return for the effort. |
| LOW
Intensity Threshold |
| 3 |
80-85% |
3-4 mM |
Natural intervals |
used in a limited way |
| 3-4 |
85-90% |
|
Medium hard interval training, distance training |
very important |
| HIGH
Intensity Threshold |
| 4 |
90-95% |
4-8 mM |
Hard interval training |
very important |
| 5 |
95-100% |
Greater than 8 mM |
Tempo Training Tests,
Short (5-10 k) Races
+ All max efforts over short time (sprints) |
Should comprise only a very small percentage of total
training volume! |
* Heart rate is based on the average value at the end of an interval bout
or on the top of hills in other training forms.
** Explaining the Two Thresholds I need to write another separate
article on this issue of blood lactate and exercise intensity. The basic lactate
threshold (also called anaerobic threshold) concept is a useful tool but also
over-simplistic. The traditional way of viewing the lactate threshold is that it
is the exercise intensity at which the working muscle becomes "anaerobic" and
lactic acid production commences. This is wrong, but the idea persists in the
popular literature because it is an easy concept to get across.
The reality is this. Even at rest we are producing lactic acid in small
quantities. Blood concentrations stay low because this lactic acid that is being
produced one place can be taken up and used by another tissue. At low exercise
intensities, no or only a very small increase in blood lactate concentration
occurs. In fact, we sometimes see blood lactate drop a little from resting
values at low exercise intensities, depending on what the athlete just ate.
However, if we increase the exercise intensity enough, but not too much, we see
blood lactate concentration increase to a new stable concentration. Now we are
crossing the Low Intensity Threshold (LIT). At this intensity(s),
the blood lactate is not out of control. Lactate removal or clearance can also
increase so that a new steady state is achieved. The highest blood lactate
concentration that can be maintained during a 30 minute exercise bout
corresponds to what we call the Maximal Lactate Steady State or MLSS. This
lactate concentration varies with the sport. It is higher in activities that
have a smaller active muscle mass like speed skating and cycling (4-6 mM). It is
lower in rowing and XC which employ more active muscle mass simultaneosly (3-4
mM). There are also inter-athlete differences, of course. The intensity at which
it occurs varies with training status. When the intensity climbs above the MLSS
workload, then we have exceeded the High Intensity Threshold (HIT) on the
chart. At these intensities, lactic acid concentration would continue to climb
over time until the concentration becomes high enough to inhibit muscle
contraction and causes fatigue. The rate of accumulation will depend on how high
above this threshold the intensity is and how effective the body is at clearing
blood lactate. We have growing evidence to indicate that the best endurance
athletes have higher lactate clearance rates. They get rid of lactic acid
faster. So LIT represents an intensity at which blood lactate begins to
rise. Between LIT and FIT we are working in a range where the increased
production is accomodated for by increased clearance by non-working muscles, the
heart (a lactic acid lover), the liver etc. HIT is the traditional red
line, the exercise intensity above which fatigue is just a matter of minutes!
How much time can be the difference between winning and losing.
Continuing tomorrow
Copyright Stephen Seiler.